![]() ![]() Meanwhile, took the view that the tweet was more of a marketing campaign than a public service announcement. Others complained of the potential inclusion of moth DNA, but this article gives no space to fly-by-night conspiracies.) Why are you holding it back?” (One common-sense response was, “So it doesn’t kill you.” Imagine what the US would be like if people had access to unlicensed vaccines. There’s no good reason for holding it back. For example, seemed impatient for the Novavax option, which was authorized for use in adults in Europe last year: “Approve Novavax with no restrictions so that we will get boosted. In terms of responses to the FDA, there was the usual nonsense from conspiracy theory-driven COVID-19 deniers, as well as more sensible responses requesting better choices and access to vaccines. If one user, whether a private individual, business, or organization, is free to say things – stupid, profound, or funny things – then another user is equally free to respond, right? It’s true that Twitter is infuriating, confusing, and completely incapable of distinguishing free speech from stupidity, but collective responses help give us the big picture when it comes to gauging public sentiment. Recently, Latin phrase-loving deus ex machina Elon Musk, himself a divisive figure, took over Twitter and vowed that “free speech” would reign. Overall, more users criticized the tweet than approved of it. Replies came from a range of vaccine skeptics, people wanting more or better access to COVID-19 vaccines, and hardcore Internet users criticizing the agency for its use of a now-vintage meme to jump on a hashtag for likes. Unfortunately, Twitter users did not respond kindly. ![]() COVID-19 vaccination has saved countless lives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |